COMPARISONS OF STTR TO SBIR
STTR = Small Business Technology TRansfer *
VERY SIMILAR TO SBIR PROGRAM
- Run mostly by same government personnel
- Same Phase I, II and III structure
- Similar funding ($100/750K max. Phase I/II) #
- Same 25 page proposal
- Same basic requirements to participate
- Same requirements to win
* reauthorized in 2001 to 2009
# legislation authorizes $750K beginning 2004
|
YET DIFFERENT FROM SBIR
- Only 0.3% of agency's extramural research budget (if over $1 billion) vs 2.5% for SBIR
- Only 5 agencies have billion $ budgets; thus only DoD, DoE, PHS, NASA and NSF participate
- Requires small business to team with an outside,
not-for-profit Research Institution (RI):
-- college/university
-- federally funded R&D center (FFRDC)
-- Govt. owned, contractor operated lab (GOCO)
- Research Institution must agree to license intellectual property to the small business
- Small for-profit business must be the prime contractor and the commercializing entity
|
ADVANTAGES FOUND IN STTR
- Longer Phase I (one year vs. 6 mos for SBIR)
- Small business must perform 40% to 70% of work
(in SBIR prime contractor must do at least 66.67%)
- RI can perform 30% to 60 % of the research work
(in SBIR all subcontracting must be < 33.33%)
- PI can be from RI at most agencies (not DoE and co-PIs required @ NSF) whereas under SBIR, the PI must be 51% employed by prime contractor
|
|